Thinking Activity: To the Lighthouse


This post is in response to the questions asked here

1) "Life is not a series of gig lamps symmetrically arranged; life is a luminous halo, a semi-transparent envelope surrounding us from the beginning of consciousness to the end." 
This statement by Woolf, in my opinion, answers the given question. Also, it is an accepted belief that the beauty of life lies in its uncertainty and imperfection. So, if Woolf was trying to capture the every day life and struggles of people, their interpersonal relationships, stream of consciousness was, and is, one of the best narrative techniques to do so. It can be agreed to a great extent that what Virginia Woolf wanted to portray or express, i.e complexity of human relationships, everyday life struggles as well as the struggles of a female artist against the middle/upper class society, etc; can only be done in the way she has done it. Stream of Consciousness, is first a psychological state and then a narrative technique. Therefore. for Woolf, what she experienced in abstractions, can only be narrated through this technique. So, for example, if the narrative shifts from James' wish to go to the lighthouse, to Mrs Ramsay's observation of him cutting out pictures from the Army and Navy catalogue, then to James' hatred towards his father, Mr Ramsay; it means that the narrator's observation includes not just one person/action, but rather, every single person/action present at that particular time/place. The very idea of a stream refers to an unbroken flow. And, the complexity of human relationships isn't a linear occurrence, nor are the every day life struggles of people. Therefore, these in my opinion can only be expressed through stream of consciousness technique.

2) Since the time of the novel's publication, Mrs Ramsay's character has remained at the center of critical discussions of the text. Mrs Ramsay, in the Indian context, matches the idea of an आदर्श बहू. She takes care of her family, arranges dinner parties for people, comforts and obeys her husband, also becomes a match-maker for some, and does all those things which 'a woman must do'. Constratingly, Lily Briscoe's character reminds us of the feminist ideology which struggles with the patriarchal society at every step of life. Now, why would Woolf want to put these two apparently different characters side by side in her novel? The answer, to a great extent, lies in the statement that the novel is a tribute and critique of Mrs Ramsay. The tribute lies in the fact that even after her death she remains alive through Lily's painting. The critique however, can be understood though the arguments presented by Andre Viola in the article Fluidity versus Muscularity: Lily's dilemma in Woolf's To the Lighthouse.  The author mentions how the Ramsay daughters, at the beginning of the novel are "presented as sporting with infidel ideas... for there was in all their minds a mute questioning of deference and chivalry." Therefore, from the very beginning, a tension is signalled in the girls regarding the pressure of their mother to conform. And Prue, who is occasionally mentioned in the novel, dies from too complete an obedience to her mother's wishes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Metaphysical poetry: critical analysis of George Herbert's Love (3)

Oulipo-Creativity through Constraints

Survey: DELL Software